It is evident that although there are clear conceptions about morality and ethical behavior, it is entirely up to individuals to choose how they will act in certain situations.
In addition, it is convenient to point out that although the scientific method implies leaving aside prejudices, it does not mean that science and technology are exempt from ethics, especially because both have a relevant impact on the environmental and social sector.
It is no secret that the abuse of science and technology at certain moments in history has generated destruction, and it is common in these areas of knowledge to tend to handle these types of situations as if they were inevitable consequences, when in fact they are not.
When evaluating the negative effects that science and technology have generated on our planet, it is evident that behavior in accordance with ethics has not always been maintained.
This puts into perspective the importance of business ethics in fields such as science and technology, whose scope is truly broad and therefore requires appropriate behavior to prevent collateral effects and irreversible damage to other people and the planet in general.
Science and technology in themselves do not represent threats to human life; everything depends on how they are used by people.
For example, although the activities carried out in nuclear power plants are currently important, it is well known that they affect people’s health. So why haven’t effective solutions been proposed before implementing the use of such harmful technologies?
On many occasions, these types of health or ecological problems are often minimized with the use of other technologies that also have harmful effects on life, or they are shown as inevitable consequences when in fact they could be prevented, prioritizing ethical behavior over other types of benefits.