The Smart Way to Build Payment Security That Auditors Love
Written by
- Redaction Team
- Business Technology, Entrepreneurship
Payment security shouldn’t feel like you’re taking a quiz and crossing your fingers you pass. Those companies that sail through compliance assessments aren’t doing anything magical – they’re taking a totally different approach to payment security than those companies that stumble.
Those organizations that pass their assessments create security practices that align with assessor goals without scrambling to put everything in place in time. There’s a world of difference between doing things for show and doing things the right way that makes assessments a validation of strong systems instead of an interrogation of scare tactics put in place last minute.
Start With How Payment Data Actually Flows
It’s easy to overcomplicate payment security, but the first step most companies miss is failing to map their card data flow. They know they take payments, but they don’t know where that card number goes from when it’s entered to when the transaction is approved.
This is important since the assessor needs to know you know your environment. If you can identify where the card input is, if there is any storage required, any transmission needed, and where it leaves your facility, you’ve done half of the assessment for them.
Make a simple visual flow chart that enables you to see where every instance of payment data exists in your company. Furthermore, this information will empower you to determine which systems and processes require security controls; if you don’t know it exists, there’s no way to protect it.
Build Security into Processes Up Front
Where does a company go wrong? They implement payment processing and attempt to adjust security after the fact. It’s like building a home before implementing a foundation.
Companies that do best do the opposite – they create workflows with security considerations already incorporated. Getting pci audit readiness advice early means you know what controls to have in place before going live instead of after the fact when issues arise. The difference in time and cost will save you massive amounts – there’s no backtracking or additional costs associated with established systems that now have to be changed mid-operation. The assessments are much less painful because you’re integrating controls as part of implementation instead of hoping for the best.
Keep Documentation Simple and Useful
Assessors want documentation that makes sense and reflects what you’re doing – not policy binders from 2003 that no one ever acknowledges.
The documentation trap occurs when you create massive policy documentation that looks pretty for the auditor but fails to match your real world. When an assessor comes in to test your systems only to find they don’t work the way your documentation says they’re supposed to, it raises flags – even if your real-life dynamics are secure.
Smart companies keep their documentation simple and pertinent. They document what they actually do instead of what they think sounds good, and they update documents when changes are made – which, by the way, is more often than companies want to admit.
There should be no extra fluff as a policy; if your staff can’t articulate what’s documented or they’re unaware of what’s documented, that documentation will create greater problems than it solves for an auditor.
Test Your Controls Before Someone Else Does
Companies that pass their assessments don’t wait for assessors to identify problems – they test their security controls regularly and fix what they can when they’re small issues.
This means running vulnerability scans, testing access controls, reviewing logs on a regular basis, checking if security measures are active and working as intended. It’s the difference between quarterly or annual testing; catching something small early means fewer significant ramifications later.
It’s not just about passing an audit – it’s about knowing your security is successful when someone who doesn’t care about your company finds things not working as intended. If an employee misconfigures something or something breaks in the interim, you’ll find out about it before it becomes a breach or failed assessment.
Make Security Part of Business as Usual
One of the commonalities among those companies that fail is they treat payment security like a special project that occurs when an audit approaches. They dust off policies and hope for the best.
Companies that sail through treat security as part of regular operations. They have schedules for security tasks that involve monthly reviews of access lists by someone, weekly reviews of logs, routine patching on a consistent basis. It’s just part of how business runs.
Shifting mindset from project to process changes the appeal when an assessment rolls around. You’re already doing what needs to be done; an assessment becomes a simple confirmation of what you know regarding your own security posture.
Train Staff on Why, Not What
Most security training teaches employees what to do – but it’s great if they know they shouldn’t share their passwords but it’s even better if they understand why an unsecured account could lead to unauthorized transactions which makes management unhappy and negatively impacts customers.
Employees take security methods more seriously when they understand them – access controls become sacrificial badge requirements because employees don’t want unknown transactions on their books or unwarranted credit card charges hurting unsuspecting customers. They understand log reviews help catch problems sooner rather than later.
Training that explains why policies are in place creates better security than training that merely dictates rules. When auditors assess your staff’s understanding of why control assessments occur instead of just what accounts must be logged daily, auditors will agree.
Automate What You Can
Some aspects of security are better off automated; companies that excel at compliance do this with automated log collection or calendared scans scheduled with alert systems in place when something is amiss. This reduces manual labor and catches items quicker.
However, the caveat is automation should not be a substitute for human intervention – someone should still understand what the automated systems do. The goal is not absolution but rather reliable consistency for tasks that should be done routinely without fail.
Assessors appreciate good automation because it means you’ve invested time in sustainable processes during which you’ve seemingly taken security seriously – but you can’t just rely on automation and hope for the best without human eyes validating results.
Plan for the Assessment All Year Long
Organizations that do well don’t start preparing when they receive their assessment notice; they maintain audit readiness all year long by documenting evidence as they go along.
This means reviewing training attendance records after training sessions occur – change reviews or incident responses – they’re not created retroactively or operating with paperwork few employees remember completing.
The best way is a simple shared folder organized per requirement; there’s no need for a complicated system – but putting evidence into all the right locations consistently means nothing will fall through the cracks.
The Real Benefit
Building payment security this way means assessments are easier and everything works as intended – all because you’re not just checking boxes for compliance assessments but creating systems that benefit your company operation realities and your customers.
Realize your assessments aren’t threats – they’re useful validations of practices implemented day-to-day because they’ve become naturalized due to building security appropriately instead of retroactively assessing a situation that operates otherwise.
When security is part of how you operate instead of implemented through scare tactics added-on downstream, compliance is no longer stressful; instead, the assessment becomes an easier approach since you’ve built confidence in your own systems.
More about Business Technology
